Analog Transport - An Alternative for Mobile Fronthaul?

Christina Lim, Yu Tian and Ampalavanapillai Nirmalathas, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australia

IEEE 5G Tech Focus: Volume 2, Number 2, May 2018

Abstract

As the wireless data traffic shows no signs of slowing down, this creates a significant challenge for the next generation wireless systems with the aggregated data in the fronthaul easily exceeding the practical limits of current CPRI-based mobile fronthaul, making the capacity of the fronthaul as the key bottleneck for the next generation wireless systems. With many alternatives currently being investigated, analog transport for mobile fronthaul emerges as a simple and practical solution to address the capacity and low-latency requirements while supporting a centralized architecture.     

1. Introduction 

The wireless landscape has experienced transformational changes over the last two decades and is further shaped by the rapid growth of affordable smart portable devices with an expected number of mobile-connected devices to reach 11 billion by 2021 [1]. The next generation wireless communications (5G and beyond) adopting a centralized radio access network architecture (CRAN) is expected to support enhanced capacity, connectivity and low latency [2]. CRAN enables pooling of processing modules (baseband units (BBUs)) in a centralized location which would serve a large number of radio processing units (remote radio heads (RRHs)) in remote locations [3]. The centralized nature also enables high-level coordination functionalities such as coordinated multi-point (CoMP) transmission and massive multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO).

Current CRAN relies on fiber-based fronthaul to provide the physical connectivity between the RRHs and BBU-pool and bases on Common Public Radio Interface (CPRI) technology [4]. CPRI uses uncompressed digitisation of the wireless signals supporting up to 12 Gb/s for use in 4G LTE-Advanced mobile systems [4]. Unfortunately current mobile CPRI fronthaul technology is not economically sustainable as it does not scale with the future wireless demands.  Such an explosion of bandwidth will create a front-haul bottleneck with CPRI style approaches only resulting in a significant wastage of optical resources. Few alternatives have recently been proposed: using data compression techniques to minimize the required fronthaul optical bandwidth [5-6], functional splits by moving more higher layer operations into the RRHs [7-9] and using analog optical transport in place of CPRI in the fronthaul links [10-18].

3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) has defined eight options for functional split between the BBU and RRH [19]. High-level functional splits improves bandwidth utilization but decentralizes control functionality and increases latency while low-level splits maintains the centralization capability but increases the bandwidth utilization. There is a tradeoff between latency, throughput and centralization capavility. One example of low-level splits is eCPRI with split point within the physical layer [20].

The analog transport of the wireless signals either at an intermediate frequency (IF) or at the radio frequency (RF) over the fronthaul link emerges as a promising option with capability to overcome the issues arising from functional splits. This scheme maintains the wireless spectral bandwidth thus reducing the requirement for CPRI transmission capacity, while enabling centralized control capability with minimal latency. Despite the simplicity of analog optical transport of the wireless signals, this approach is currently not popular among network providers. The main reason being that analog signals are more prone to noise and nonlinearity impacting the dynamic range of the link. This is true for large macrocell sites that require a large dynamic range to satisfactorily service users at cell edges. Wireless infrastructure evolving towards smaller cell sizes relaxes this stringent requirement on the dynamic range. Analog transport may now emerge as a serious contender for mobile fronthaul.

2. Analog Transport of Wireless Signals 

Traditionally the concept of analog transport of wireless signals is shown in Fig. 1. The wireless signals are modulated onto an optical carrier and then distributed optically via an optical distribution network. The wireless signals are then detected using a photodetector before they are distributed wirelessly to the end users. The wireless signals can be transported at intermediate frequencies over fiber (IFoF) (Fig. 1a) or at the designated wireless frequency over fiber (RFoF) (Fig. 1b).

analogTransportFig1

Figure 1:  Schematic of (a) IFoF and (b) RFoF transport schemes

RFoF transport is the simplest technique as the detection in the RRH only requires direct detection using a photodetector and does not require additional frequency translation stages. It has the advantage of realizing a small footprint RRH with full centralized control architecture. Despite the simplistic design, this scheme suffers from RF power fading due to fiber chromatic dispersion [21] and the requirement for optical devices with speeds matching that of the wireless carrier frequency which becomes more stringent for wireless signals in the millimeter-wave region.

IFoF transport overcomes the limitations of RFoF where relatively low-speed optoelectronic devices are required as the wireless signals are distributed optically at a much lower frequency and hence, has much reduced fiber chromatic dispersion effects. On the contrary, the RRH requires frequency translation stages that demand stable local oscillators and linear mixers. The complexity increases with wireless carrier frequency and may impede future network upgradability.

3. Demonstration of IFoF for 5G Fronthauls

There have been a number of reported demonstrations of IFoF for mobile fronthaul transport [10-13]. These demonstrations include the distribution of 128 x 100 MHz signals over 20 km of fronthaul link based on sub-Nyquist sampling technique [10], 32 x 200 MHz signals over 1 km of fronthaul link [11], bi-directional transmission of 20 x 80 MHz downlink signals and 16 x 80 MHz uplink signals over 25 km of fronthaul link based on carrier aggregation [12] and 60 GHz using leaky wave antenna [13]. These demonstrations focus on pushing the boundary of capacity improvement.

Ishimura et. al. has demonstrated an IFoF transport scheme that supports wideband operation and long-distance transmission by overcoming the impact of dispersion-induced RF power fading for transporting double sideband formatted wireless signals [14]. The scheme is based on a parallel intensity modulation (IM)/phase modulation (PM) transmitter that exploits the complementary relationship of the IM and PM signals response of the link. Therefore by assigning the aggregated IF signals to the appropriate modulators during electrical-to-optical conversion, the optically modulated IF signals will experience a relatively flat response over the fronthaul link thus overcoming the impact of fiber chromatic dispersion. They have demonstrated a transmission of 20 x 360 MHz orthogonal-frequency division multiplexed (OFDM) signals over 40 km of single-mode fiber (SMF) [14] and 14 x 1.2 GHz OFDM signals over 20 km of SMF [15].

Sung et. al. has demonstrated the feasibility of an IFoF transport for mobile fronthaul for 28 GHz wireless operation with real-time processing [16]. In the proposed scheme, the clock signal was simultaneously transmitted with the wireless signals in the form of an IF carrier. The clock was then used to convert the IF signals to the 28 GHz wireless signals, and hence reducing the implementation cost of the RRH. The results showed that simultaneous clock transmission resulted in performance degradation of <0.5% in error vector magnitude. A peak data rate of 1.5 Gb/s per user was demonstrated in this transmission [16].

4. Demonstration of RFoF for 5G Fronthauls

Apart from IFoF transport, there are also reported RFoF transport for mobile fronthaul targeting towards mm-wave wireless signals transmission for 5G [17-18]. Dat et.al. demonstrated the transmission of 2 x 20MHz LTE-A and 4 x 800MHz F-OFDM for 90GHz wireless transmission using dual optical carriers with photonics upconversion [17].    

Tian et. al. has demonstrated an RFoF transport scheme for the distribution of 60 GHz wireless signals in a multi-user mobile fronthaul link incorporating non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) scheme [18]. This highlights the centralized controlled capability of BBU pool with a proof-of-concept demonstration for a two-user scenario. Figure 2 shows the architecture of the 60 GHz RFoF fronthaul with the RRH serving two users spatially separated within the same cell – one user closer to the RRH (NU) and one user at the cell edge (FU). To ensure the far user (FU) has similar performance as the near user (NU), the centralized BBU jointly process and multiplex the signals from the two users in the power domain using NOMA scheme with significant different electrical launched power favoring the FU. Tian et. al. proposed a NOMA scheme using a novel multilevel code (MLC) scheme that ensured no error propagation from the far user to the near user, enabling more flexible power allocation ratio design at the centralized BBU [18]. A total of 8 Gb/s was demonstrated over 3 km of SMF and up to 2.5m wireless link at 60 GHz to simultaneously serve a near user located at 0.38 m and a far user at 2.5m from the RRH.

analogTransportFig2

Figure 2: System architecture for 60 GHz wireless with RFoF fronthaul incorporating NOMA scheme

5. Conclusions 

CPRI-based mobile fronthaul will be a bottleneck for the next generation wireless systems. To maintain a bandwidth-efficient centralized architecture supporting latency sensitive applications, analog transport technology emerges as a potential solution for mobile fronthaul. Despite the elegance and simplicity, there are still many technical challenges including implementation cost, interoperability and compatibility, that need to be further addressed.

References 

  1. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2016-2021, [Online], http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/mobile-white-paper-c11-520862.pdf
  2. Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future Development of IMT for 2020 and Beyond, ITU-R M.2083, 2015.
  3. S. Mattisson, “Overiview of 5G requirements and future wireless networks”, in Proc. 43rd IEEE European Solid State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC 2017), pp. 1-6, 2017.
  4. CPRI Specification V6.0, [Online], http://www.cpri.info/downloads/CPRI_v_6_0_2013-08-30.pdf
  5. D. Samardzija, J. Pastalan, M. MacDonald, S. Walker, and R. Valenzuela, “Compressed transport of baseband signals in radio access networks,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Communications, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 3216-3225, 2012.
  6. S.H. Kim, H.S. Chung, and S.M. Kim, “Experimental demonstration of CPRI data compression based on partial bit sampling for mobile front-haul link in C-RAN”, in Proc. 2016 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC 2016), pp. 1-3, 2016.
  7. A. Maedar, M. Lalam, A.D. Domenico, E. Pateromichelakis, D. Wubben, J. Bartelt, R. Fritzsche and P. Rost, “Towards a flexible function split for cloud-RAN networks,” in Proc. of European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC), 2014.
  8. N.J. Gomes, P. Chanclou, P. Turnbull, A. Magee, and V. Jungnickel, “Fronthaul evolution: from CPRI to Ethernet,” Journal of Optical Fiber Technology, vol. 26, pp. 50-58, Dec. 2015.
  9. S. Zhou, X. Liu, F. Effenberger, and J. Chao, “Mobile-PON: A high-efficiency low-latency mobile fronthaul based on functional split and TDM-PON with a unified scheduler,” in Proc. of 2017 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC 2017), pp. 1-3, 2017.
  10. L. Cheng, X. Liu, N. Chand, F. Effenberger, and G. Chang, “Experimental demonstration of sub-Nyquist sampling for bandwidth and hardware-efficient mobile fronthaul supporting 128 x 128 MIMO with 100MHz OFDM signals”, in Proc. Optical Fiber Comm. Conference, pp. 1-3, 2015.
  11. X. Liu, H. Zeng, N. Chand, and F. Effenberger, “Efficient mobile fronthaul via DSP-based channel aggregation”, J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1556-1564, 2016.
  12. M. Xu, J. Yan, J. Zhang, F. Lu, J. Wang, L. Cheng, D. Guidotti, and G.K. Chang, “Bidirectional fiber-wireless access technology for 5G mobile spectral aggregation and cell densification”, J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. B104-B110, 2016.
  13. U. Habib, M. Steeg, A. Stohr, and N. Gomes, “Radio-over-fiber-supported 60GHz multiuser transmission using leaky wave antenna”, Proc. Microwave Photonics (MWP), pp. 1-4, 2017.
  14. S. Ishimura, B.G. Kim, K. Tanaka, K. Nishimura, H. Kim, Y.C. Chung, and M. Suzuki, “Broadband IF-over-fiber transmission with parallel IM/PM transmitter overcoming dispersion-induced RF power fading for high-capacity mobile fronthaul links”, IEEE Photonics J., vol. 10, no. 1, 790069, 2018.
  15. S. Ishimura, A. Bekkali, K. Tanaka, K. Nishimura, and M. Suzuki, “1.032-Tb/s CPRI-equivalent rate IF-over-fiber transmission using a parallel IM/PM transmitter for high-capacity mobile fronthaul links”, J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 36, no. 8, pp.1478-1484, 2018.
  16. M. Sung, S. Cho, J. Kim, J.K. Lee, J.H. Lee, and H.S. Chung, “Demonstration of IFoF-based mobile fronthaul in 5G prototype with 28-GHz millimeter wave”, J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 601-609, 2018.
  17. P.T. Dat, A. Kanno, N. Yamamoto, and T. Kawanishi, “190-Gb/s CPRI-equivalent rate fiber-wireless mobile fronthaul for simultaneous transmission of LTE-A and F-OFDM signals”, Proc. European Conference on Optical Communications (ECOC), pp. 1-3, 2016.
  18. Y. Tian, K.L. Lee, C. Lim, and A. Nirmalathas, “Demonstration of non-orthogonal multiple access scheme using multilevel coding without successive interference cancellation with 60GHz radio-over-fiber fronthaul”, in Proc. 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC 2018), paper Tu3J.4, 2018.
  19. 3GPP TR 38.801 v2.0.0 Release 14, 2017.
  20. eCPRI Specification v1.0, “Common public radio interface: eCPRI interface specification”, Aug. 2017.
  21. H. Schmuck, “Comparison of optical millimeter-wave system concepts with regard to chromatic dispersion”, Electron. Lett., vol. 31, pp. 1848-1849, 1995.

 

limChristina Lim received the Ph.D. degrees in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Melbourne, Australia in 2000.  She is a Professor and currently the Deputy Head of Department at the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, the University of Melbourne, Australia.  She was awarded the Australian Research Council (ARC) Australian Research Fellowship from 2004-2008 and the ARC Future Fellow (2009-2013).  She was an elected member of the IEEE Photonics Society Board of Governors (2015-2017) and currently serving in the IEEE Photonics Society Conference Council. She is also a member of the Steering Committee for the IEEE Topical Meeting on Microwave Photonics Conference. She is an Associate Editor for IEEE Photonics Technology Letters and IET Electronics Letter. Her research interests include fiber-wireless access technology, modeling of optical and wireless communication systems, microwave photonics, and optical network architectures.

 

tian

Yu Tian received the B.S. degree in Optoelectronic Information Engineering from Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, in 2014. Since 2014, she has been working towards the Ph.D. degree in fiber wireless communications in the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Her main research interests are primarily in the area of 60 GHz radio-over-fiber fronthaul communications with an emphasis on physical layer network implementation, coordinated multipoint transmission, non-orthogonal multiple access schemes, and system level simulation.

 

 

nirmalathas

Thas A Nirmalathas is a Professor of Electrical and Electronic Engineering at the University of Melbourne and also Director of the Networked Society Institute – an interdisciplinary research institute focusing on challenges and opportunities arising from the society’s transition towards a networked society. Prof Nirmalathas obtained his PhD in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Melbourne. Over the past two decades, he has held many senior leadership positions at the University of Melbourne including Head of Department, Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He has also held visiting scientists appointments at NICT Japan and I2R Singapore. Thas has written more than 450 technical articles. His current research interests include energy efficient telecommunications, access networks, optical-wireless network integration and broadband systems and devices.

 

Editor: Rod Waterhouse

 


 

Subscribe to Tech Focus

Join our free IEEE Future Networks Technical Community and receive IEEE Future NetworksTech Focus.

Subscribe Now

 

Catalog of Past Articles

 

Article Contributions Welcome

If you wish to have an article considered for publication, please contact Amine Maaref, Managing Editor, at amine.maaref@gmail.com or Siming Zhang, Associate Managing Editor at simingzhang89@gmail.com

Author guidelines can be found here


IEEE Future Networks Tech Focus Editorial Board

Geoffrey Li, Editor-in-Chief
Amine Maaref, Managing Editor
Siming Zhang, Assoc. Managing Editor
Imran Shafique Ansari
Anwer Al-Dulaimi
Stefano Buzzi
Yunlong Cai
Zhi Ning Chen
Panagiotis Demestichas
Gerry Hayes
Chih-Lin I
James Irvine
Meng Lu
Ross Stone 
Rod Waterhouse
Shugong Xu
Haijun Zhang
Anding Zhu